Description
Evaluates an LLM's capability to function as a coding assistant by answering a variety of coding-related questions across different programming languages and question types.
Provider
StackOverflow
Language
English
Evaluation
Auto-evaluation with GPT-4o over ground-truth.
Data Statistics
Number of Samples925
Collection PeriodJanuary 2018 - September 2023
Question Type
The type of coding question asked.
Complexity
The complexity level of the questions.
Programming Language
The programming language used in the question.

Results based on 0 entries.

Last updated: Invalid Date

#
Model
Provider
Size
Acceptance
No results.

Rows per page

Page 1 of 0

Examples

User Question

How to create a list of lists where each sub-list 'increments' as follows: [1, 0, 0], [1, 1, 0], [1, 1, 1]. This works but is unwieldy and not very 'Pythonic'. I'd also like to be able to run through different values for 'numValues', say 4 to 40.

innerList = []
outerList = []
numValues = 12
loopIter = 0

for i in range(numValues):
    innerList.append(0)

for i in range(numValues):
    copyInnerList = innerList.copy()
    outerList.append(copyInnerList)

for i in range(len(innerList)):
    for j in range(loopIter + 1):
        outerList[i][j] = 1
    loopIter += 1

print(outerList)

User Question

How to fix String field does not implement Copy? I am building a simple command-line todo app in Rust. If I don't implement the copy trait I get this error: move occurs because 'todo' has type 'todo::Todo', which does not implement the 'Copy' trait. When I try to implement the Copy trait for my Todo struct, I receive the following error: field text: String does not implement the Copy trait. How do I fix this error? My code is below:

pub type todo_type = Vec<Todo>;

#[derive(Copy)]
pub struct Todo {
    id: usize,
    text: String,
    completed: bool,
}

impl Todo {
    pub fn new(text: String, id: usize) -> Todo {
        Todo {
            text,
            id,
            completed: false,
        }
    }
}

pub struct Todos {
    todos: todo_type,
}

impl Todos {
    pub fn new(todos: todo_type) -> Todos {
        Todos { todos }
    }

    pub fn get_all_todos(self) -> todo_type {
        self.todos
    }

    pub fn get_single_todo(self, todo_index: usize) -> Todo {
        unimplemented!()
    }

    pub fn add_todo(self, text: String) -> Todo {
        let id: usize = 1;

        if self.todos.len() == 0 {
            let id = 1;
        } else {
            let last_todo = match self.todos.len() {
                0 => None,
                n => Some(&self.todos[n - 1]),
            };
            let id = last_todo.unwrap().id;
        }

        let todo = Todo::new(text, id);
        self.todos.push(todo);

        todo
    }

    pub fn remove_todo(self, todo_index: usize) -> bool {
        self.todos.remove(todo_index);

        true
    }
}

User Question

Koa + TypeScript: Property 'body' does not exist on type Request. I wanted to use koa & koa-bodyparser with TypeScript but whenever I access ctx.request.body I get an error that body doesn't exist on type Request.

import Koa from 'koa'
import Router from 'koa-router'
import bodyparser from 'koa-bodyparser'

const app = new Koa()
const router = new Router()

const data = ['lorem', 'ipsum', 'dolor', 'sit', 'amet']

app.use(bodyparser())
router.post('/', (ctx, next) => {
    const phrase = ctx.request.body; // Property 'body' does not exist on type Request
    if (typeof phrase === 'string') {
        ctx.response.body = data.filter(element => element.includes(phrase))
    }
})

User Question

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality? I have a class for which equality (as per equals()) must be defined by the object identity, i.e. this == other. I want to implement Comparable to order such objects (say by some getName() property). To be consistent with equals(), compareTo() must not return 0, even if two objects have the same name.

Is there a way to compare object identities in the sense of compareTo? I could compare System.identityHashCode(o), but that would still return 0 in case of hash collisions.

Have a unique use-case you’d like to test?

We want to evaluate how LLMs perform on your specific, real world task. You might discover that a small, open-source model delivers the performance you need at a better cost than proprietary models. We can also add custom filters, enhancing your insights into LLM capabilities. Each time a new model is released, we'll provide you with updated performance results.

Leaderboard

An open-source model beating GPT-4 Turbo on our interactive leaderboard.

Don’t worry, we’ll never spam you.

Please, briefly describe your use case and motivation. We’ll get back to you with details on how we can add your benchmark.